Class of 2025

1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

The purpose of the Academic Calendar is to acquaint students with the academic requirements, regulations, policies, procedures and expectations of the Program.  It is the responsibility of the student to read and understand the entire Academic Calendar.  Questions about any of its contents should be directed to the Program Director.

---

1.2 Acknowledgement of Territory

Queen’s University in Kingston is situated on traditional Anishinaabe and Haudenosaunee Territory. To acknowledge this traditional territory is to recognize its longer history, one predating the establishment of the earliest European colonies.  It is also to acknowledge this territory’s significance for the Indigenous peoples who lived, and continue to live, upon it – people whose practices and spiritualties were tied to the land and continue to develop in relationship to the territory and its other inhabitants today.  The Kingston Indigenous community continues to reflect the area’s Anishinaabek and Haudenosaunee roots.  There is also a significant Métis community and there are First Peoples from other Nations across Turtle Island present today.

SmithToronto operates on sacred land that has been a site of human activity for 15,000 years. This land is the territory of the Huron-Wendat and Petun First Nations, the Seneca, and most recently, the Mississaugas of the Credit River. The territory was the subject of the Dish With One Spoon Wampum Belt Covenant, an agreement between the Iroquois Confederacy and Confederacy of the Ojibwe and allied nations to peaceably share and care for the resources around the Great Lakes. Today, the meeting place of Toronto is still the home to many Indigenous people from across Turtle Island and we are grateful to have the opportunity to work in the community on this territory.

2: PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND GRADING

2.1 Jurisdiction

Students of Smith School of Business at Queen’s University are governed by the regulations, policies and practices of this institution.  
It is the responsibility of every student in the Program to read and understand these policies, regulations, and requirements as well as those of their home, exchange and double degree universities.  

---

2.2 Program Format

The Smith Master of Financial Innovation & Technology (“MFIT”) Program is approved by the Senate and Board of Trustees of the University, and by the Ontario Council for Graduate Studies.  Upon graduation, students receive a Master of Financial Innovation & Technology Degree.   

The Smith Master of Financial Innovation & Technology Program provides students with the opportunity to gain the educational and professional advantages of a Smith Program without interrupting a successful career. The program will focus on developing a unique combination of skills consisting of a deep understanding of financial models and data and technology. 

2.2.1 Program Delivery

The Smith Master of Financial Innovation & Technology Program holds classes on weeknights and weekends at SmithToronto, supplemented by two on-campus residency periods in Toronto and/or Kingston. All classes and residencies are held in-person.

At the beginning of the program, students are introduced to their Team Coach, network support staff, instructors, and program staff.

---

2.3 Timeframe

Once registered in the Program, the student is expected to complete all degree requirements without interruption.  The Program will be completed in 12 consecutive months, beginning in January and ending in December.

---

2.4 Degree Requirements and Courses

The Smith Master of Financial Innovation & Technology Program is a 12-month program in which students complete 14 courses (36 credits), all of which are mandatory courses.  To be eligible for graduation, students must complete all courses in the Program in the year in which they are registered, and uphold and/or meet each of the Academic Regulations (Section 3 of this document).  

2.4.1 Required and Elective Courses
All required courses for the Program must be completed at Smith in the year that the student is registered in the Program. 

2.4.1.1 Required courses
All students must complete the following required courses in accordance with the Academic Regulations set out in Section 3 of this document.  

MFIT 895 Financial Engineering

MFIT 822 Creating New Ventures           

MFIT 824 Designing Digital Innovation           

MFIT 846 Banking Disrupted           

MFIT 892 Crypto-Economics and Payments           

MFIT 841 Digital Capital Markets           

MFIT 842 Automated Investing           

MFIT 848 Team-Based Project Course           

MFIT 893 Fin Data Privacy & Security           

MFIT 803 AI Ethics and Policy          

MFIT 860 Acquisition and Mgmt of Data          

MFIT 863 Intro to Analytical Modelling          

MFIT 867 Predictive Modelling          

MFIT 869 Machine Learning & AI

2.4.2 Course Substitutions

Students must complete all required courses at Smith within the required timeframe to graduate from the Program. 

If extenuating circumstances prevent a student from completing the Program in the required timeframe, the student will be required to complete outstanding courses as directed by the Program Director or Academic Progress Committee.  Normally, if one or more of the missed courses is not offered again in the year the student is registered in the Program, the student will be permitted to take the course in the subsequent year when the course is offered again.

2.4.3 Auditing Courses
A student may request to audit a course.  A formal written request to audit must be made to the Program Director at least seven days before the first session of the course to be audited.  Requests to audit courses will be considered depending on space, professor approval and other relevant course-specific factors.  

---

2.5 Grading

2.5.1 Queen’s University Grading 

The grading system for courses in the Queen's Program is: 

Grading (Business)

Letter Grade	Grade Point	Percentage
A+	4.3	90-100
A	4.0	85-89.9
A-	3.7	80-84.9
B+	3.3	77-79.9
B	3.0	73-76.9
B-	2.7	70-72.9
C+	2.3	67-69.9
C	2.0	63-66.9
C-	1.7	60-62.9
D+	1.3	57-59.9
D	1.0	53-56.9
D-	0.7	50-52.9
F	0.0	0-49.9

Other academic entries which may be assigned are: 

System of Grading

Letter Grade	Description
P	Pass; no grade assigned
FR	Failure with review, grade will be revised
CR	Credit
IN	Incomplete
GD	Grade deferred
AG	Aegrotat*
RTW	Required to withdraw
NG	Not graded; first term course of a multi-term course
AU	Audit
TR	Transfer credit, no grade assigned
DR	Course dropped
NEP	Not eligible to proceed
IP	In progress

*Aegrotat: An academic entry which provides an estimated final grade or, if that is not possible, credit for a course without a grade because of extenuating circumstances beyond the student’s control that prevented the student from completing all work of the course, particularly the final examination. Normally at least 60 per cent of the work to be evaluated in the course (assignments, midterms, final examination, as specified in the course). 

Requests for AG or CR standing should be made to the Program Director.

2.5.2 Grading Specifications
All final marks, including those assigned after special examinations, may be based on the results of formal examinations and on grades obtained from other work throughout the course, which may include essays, exercises, reports, presentations, class tests/quizzes, and class participation or other work. 

At the beginning of each course, the professor will provide a clear statement of the basis on which the final mark will be assessed. All work assigned and the weight that it will contribute to the final mark will be specified.  Normally there is both individual and teamwork included in course assessments.

2.5.3 Class Participation
Class participation grades are allocated in some courses. Professors will specify the specific form and opportunities for participation marks at the start of the course.  Some examples include contributions to class discussions or discussion boards, attendance, timely completion of assigned work, or other relevant behaviours determined by the professor.

3: ACADEMIC REGULATIONS AND STANDINGS

Academic Regulations exist to maintain the standards of the Program, and to ensure the candidates of the Program have the mandatory knowledge and experience to merit receiving the Degree.  Degrees are awarded according to the requirements and processes set out in the Academic Regulations.

Every student is responsible for knowing and meeting or upholding the Academic Regulations of the Program in order to progress through the Program and ultimately be eligible for the Degree.  The Academic Regulations below are currently in effect.  Regulations are consistently reviewed and may change from time to time.  Any changes that take place during the academic year will be communicated to students; it remains the student’s responsibility to be aware of any such changes.  

3.1 Academic Regulations

Each candidate for the Degree must successfully meet or achieve the Regulations below in order to be in Good Academic Standing, to progress through the Program, and to be eligible for graduation from the Program.  In a case where a student violates any one of the Regulations, that student is normally required to withdraw from the Program (see section 3.2 for further information).  

Every student must achieve the following:

3.1.1 Complete Program Curriculum  
The student must complete all components of the curriculum as outlined in Section 2.

3.1.2 Overall Minimum GPA
The student must achieve a cumulative GPA of at least 2.7 (B-) including all courses taken in the Program.

3.1.3 Minimum Course Grades
The student may obtain final grades of less than 2.0 (C) in no more than the equivalent of 2 full courses (6 credits) throughout the Program.

3.1.4 No Failures
The student must obtain a final grade of at least 0.7 (D-) in each course.

3.1.5 Attendance
The student may not miss more than 25% of class sessions of any course. 

Class attendance is monitored and concerns related to attendance will be addressed with the student.

---

3.2 Academic Standing

The following Academic Standings may apply, depending on individual circumstances:

3.2.1 Good Academic Standing
In order to progress through the Program and to be eligible for the Degree, a student must be in Good Academic Standing.  A student is considered to be in Good Academic Standing when they uphold the Academic Regulations set out in Section 3.1 above. A student who fails to uphold any one of the Academic Regulations is no longer in Good Academic Standing, and is normally required to withdraw from the Program.  The student is considered to be in Academic Jeopardy until a decision is made by the appropriate body.  

3.2.2 Academic Jeopardy
A student who fails to meet any one or more of the Academic Regulations is deemed to be in Academic Jeopardy until a decision is made about their situation.   Students in this situation will first be reviewed by the Program Director.  In some cases an informal resolution may be possible (for example, an opportunity to re-take an exam if the student has official evidence of being gravely ill on the day of the exam) and, if successful, the student may return to Good Academic Standing. In cases where an informal resolution is not possible, the Program Director will inform the student in writing of the requirement to withdraw from the Program, subject to the student’s right of appeal.

3.2.3 Academic Probation
A student who has failed to meet one or more of the Academic Regulations and who has successfully appealed to the Academic Progress Committee may be permitted to continue in the Program, on Academic Probation, subject to specific terms, conditions, standards and timeframes tailored to the situation. A student who successfully completes the conditions of their Academic Probation will be released from Academic Probation and return to Good Academic Standing.  A student who fails to meet the conditions of their Academic Probation will normally be required to withdraw from the Program, subject to their right of appeal.  

3.2.4 Requirement to Withdraw 
A student who has failed to meet any one or more of the Academic Regulations is normally required to withdraw from the Program, subject to their right of appeal (see section 5).  Further, a student who fails to meet the conditions of their Academic Probation will normally be required to withdraw from the Program.

3.2.5 Effective Date of Sanctions
Sanctions or adverse academic decisions, such as Academic Probation (and its terms and conditions) or a requirement to withdraw, shall take effect as soon as the student accepts the sanction OR exhausts (or allows to lapse) their right to appeal to the next level in accordance with Section 20 of Queen’s University Senate Policy on Student Academic Appeals:

1. Ordinarily, no sanction, penalty or requirement to withdraw shall be put into effect until the student affected has either exhausted all channels of appeal or has allowed the time for appeal to lapse. For the purpose of this provision, the University will normally consider an adverse academic decision to be a sanction.
2. Notwithstanding subsection (1), where an academic unit determines that the interests of third parties may be prejudiced by the continued enrollment of a student in a course or program, the unit may decide that pending an appeal from an adverse academic decision, the student should not be permitted to continue in the course or program, or may be precluded from progressing to the next academic stage.
3. A student who is subject to suspension from a program under subsection (2) may request that the Chair of the appellate body with jurisdiction over the matter expedite the hearing of the appeal. This request may result in a direction abridging the time for filing of documents, or other interim or preliminary direction made pursuant to Section 36 of Queen’s University Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights and Discipline.

4: ACADEMIC STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS

4.1 Academic Integrity 

Queen’s University is dedicated to creating a scholarly community free to explore a range of ideas, to build and advance knowledge, and to share the ideas and knowledge that emerge from a range of intellectual pursuits.

Queen’s students, faculty, administrators and staff therefore all have responsibilities for supporting and upholding the fundamental values of academic integrity. Academic integrity is constituted by the five core fundamental values of honesty, trust, fairness, respect and responsibility (see International Centre for Academic Integrity) and by the quality of courage. These values and qualities are central to the building, nurturing and sustaining of an academic community in which all members of the community will thrive. Adherence to the values expressed through academic integrity forms a foundation for the "freedom of inquiry and exchange of ideas" essential to the intellectual life of the University.

The following statements from “The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity” (2nd edition), developed by the International Center for Academic Integrity (ICAI), contextualize these values and qualities:

1. Honesty: Academic communities of integrity advance the quest for truth and knowledge through intellectual and personal honesty in learning, teaching, research, and service.
2. Trust: Academic communities of integrity both foster and rely upon climates of mutual trust. Climates of trust encourage and support the free exchange of ideas which in turn allows scholarly inquiry to reach its fullest potential.
3. Fairness: Academic communities of integrity establish clear and transparent expectations, standards, and practices to support fairness in the interactions of students, faculty, and administrators.
4. Respect: Academic communities of integrity value the interactive, cooperative, participatory nature of learning. They honor, value, and consider diverse opinions and ideas.
5. Responsibility: Academic communities of integrity rest upon foundations of personal accountability coupled with the willingness of individuals and groups to lead by example, uphold mutually agreed-upon standards, and take action when they encounter wrongdoing.
6. Courage: To develop and sustain communities of integrity, it takes more than simply believing in the fundamental values. Translating the values from talking points into action -- standing up for them in the face of pressure and adversity — requires determination, commitment, and courage.

Students are responsible for familiarizing themselves with and adhering to the regulations concerning academic integrity. General information on academic integrity is available at Academic Integrity @ Queen's University, along with School specific information below.

4.1.1 Departures from Academic Integrity

A departure from academic integrity includes any deliberate attempt to gain unfair advantage academically for oneself or others. All forms of departure from academic integrity are considered serious offences within the University community. The following defines the domain of relevant acts without providing an exhaustive list:

4.1.1.1 Plagiarism 

Allowing it to be thought that another's ideas or phrasings are one's own by failing to provide proper acknowledgement. Some examples are:

• Copying and pasting from the internet
• Copying a printed source or other resource without proper acknowledgement
• Copying from another student in the same or different year of the Program or another Program
• Copying from another’s test paper
• Using direct quotations or large sections of paraphrased material in an assignment without appropriate acknowledgement
• Buying term papers or other assignments and submitting them as one's own
• Submitting the same piece of work in more than one course without the permission of the instructors
• Obtaining a copy of, or information about, a test or exam from an earlier section of the course and writing the test or exam later in the day or subsequent days.

4.1.1.2 Use of Unauthorized Materials

• Possessing or using unauthorized study materials or aids during a test
• Copying from another's test paper
• Using an unauthorized calculator or other aids during a test
• Unauthorized removal of materials from the library, or deliberate concealment of library materials
• Obtaining materials such as answer keys and using them to obtain an unfair advantage.

4.1.1.3 Facilitation

• Enabling another's breach of academic integrity
• Making information available to another student, such as knowingly allowing one's essay or assignment to be copied by someone else, giving a copy of a test or exam to a student writing the same test or exam later in the day or subsequent days
• Selling or distributing term papers or other assignments
• Knowingly assisting another person to conceal their departure from academic integrity.

4.1.1.4 Unauthorized Collaboration

• Working with others, without the specific permission of the instructor, on assignments that will be submitted for a grade
• This applies to in-class or take-home tests, papers, or homework assignments. Students may not collaborate without the instructor’s authorization.

4.1.1.5 Forgery 

• Utilizing counterfeit documents or statements (e.g. creating or altering a transcript, medical note or other official documents).

4.1.1.6 Falsification

• Misrepresentation of one's self, one's work or one's relation to the University
• Altering transcripts or other official documents relating to student records
• Impersonating someone in an examination or test
• Submitting a take-home examination written, in whole or in part, by someone else
• Fabricating or falsifying research data or source material (whether by commission or by omission)
• Allowing someone else to do research work without the knowledge and approval of the instructor
• Failing to appropriately recognize contributions of others
• Attributing authorship of work to persons other than those who have contributed to the work in a meaningful way.

4.1.2 Process for Investigating Suspected Departures from Academic Integrity

The Smith School of Business Policy on Academic Integrity sets out complete procedures and processes for handling suspected departures from academic integrity.  Students are responsible for familiarizing themselves with the policy.  Normally, where a course professor has a concern about a possible departure from academic integrity, the professor will notify the student and investigate in accordance with Smith policy.  The student will have an opportunity to respond and their response will be considered part of the evidence in the case. 

In complex cases the professor may refer the case to the Smith School of Business Academic Integrity Panel for investigation.  In this situation, the Academic Integrity Panel will notify the student of the potential departure and investigate in accordance with Smith policy. 

In cases of a subsequent departure from academic integrity (that is, where there is a previous departure on record for the student), the professor will make a finding but refer the case to the Academic Integrity Panel for the determination of a sanction.     

4.1.3 Sanctions for Departures from Academic Integrity

Following the investigation of the suspected departure from Academic Integrity, the professor/Academic Integrity Panel will either: i) make a finding of a departure from academic integrity and impose a sanction (or refer the matter to the AI Panel for sanction); or ii) determine there was no departure and destroy all evidence of the notice and investigation.

Any student who is found to have committed a violation of academic integrity may face a range of sanctions, including but not limited to: receiving a warning, a grade of zero on the assignment, a failure in the course, a recommendation to Queen's Senate that the student be required to withdraw from the University for a period of time, or that a degree be rescinded. 

Records of findings of departures from AI are kept in the Dean’s Office and in the Program Office.  Students who are found to have subsequent violations of academic integrity will normally face progressively more serious sanctions.

---

4.2 Illness and Extenuating Circumstances Policies

4.2.1 Illness 

A student who claims illness as a reason for missing academic obligations is responsible for informing the professor and the Program Director and may be required to provide evidence of illness.  In keeping with University Academic Consideration for Students in Extenuating Circumstances Policy, a student suffering from a short-term illness should submit the appropriate form outlining their needs. 

A notification of absence from an examination must be accompanied by documentation as follows:

• in cases of illness when a student is under the care of a physician, the student should provide a note from the physician. Retroactive doctors’ notes (i.e. notes dated from physicians after the illness) are not acceptable.
• If a student is ill, but not under the care of a physician prior to and during an exam, they can provide the appropriate form(s) outlining their situation.

As a matter of academic integrity, a student is responsible for making an honest declaration concerning the nature of their illness and its impact on their academic obligations.  False declarations may be investigated under the Smith Academic Integrity Policy.

4.2.2 Extenuating Circumstances 

The Program adheres to Queen’s Academic Consideration for Students in Extenuating Circumstances Policy and the principle of a good faith response to requests for consideration.

Extenuating circumstances means a personal circumstance beyond the student’s control that has a direct and substantial impact on the student’s ability to meet essential academic requirements or expectations.  Extenuating circumstances include but are not limited to a sudden or acute physical or mental illness, serious injury to self or significant others, bereavement, a traumatic event, or other serious personal/family crisis.  Extenuating circumstances may also include officially representing the university at a sanctioned event or through an invitation to participate in an event as a distinguished guest (e.g. national tournament, Olympics).

 A student who is unable to satisfy the requirements of a course or the Program due to extenuating circumstances must notify the Program Director in writing as soon as possible.  Students may submit the appropriate form(s).

If the student is requesting a modification of the Program requirements, a formal written request should be submitted to the Program Director.  The request for modification should include an explanation of the connection between the effects of extenuating circumstances on the academic performance, as well as the remedy the student is seeking.

The Program Director will respond to the student’s request for consideration promptly.  The Program is committed to responding to students in a fair and consistent manner, taking into account the specific individual circumstances.  The Program is also committed to upholding academic standards and ensuring that essential academic requirements are met.

4.2.3 Official Documentation 

Official documentation, including notes from health care professionals, need not outline the specific details of the student’s condition, but must clearly indicate ways in which the circumstances directly affect the student’s performance, and verify that these effects were substantial enough to cause the academic disruption.  Information about the start, duration and present state of the condition or circumstances, as well as a clear statement on whether the condition or circumstances have either improved or are being managed so that they will not have a significant detrimental effect on future academic performance, are essential.

Documents submitted may be verified by the Program administration.  False statements or documents may be investigated in accordance with the Smith Policy on Academic Integrity.

4.2.4 Unresolved Circumstances

The appeals process does not compensate for circumstances that the student is unable to resolve, or for which the student is unwilling to actively seek accommodation. In addition, the appeals process does not compensate for circumstances that are actively being accommodated, for example where a student’s permanent disabilities are being accommodated through Queen’s Student Accessibility Services Office.

Multiple appeals citing the same circumstances will be reviewed very closely. This review may include, with the permission of the student, consultation with the appropriate professionals involved to obtain more detailed information. In order for such an appeal to succeed, there must be convincing evidence that the circumstances that affected the student’s academic performance will be resolved within a reasonable timeline, or will be appropriately managed on an ongoing basis.

---

4.3 Language

In accordance with Queen’s University Language Policy, examinations and assignments are to be submitted in English, except where a Faculty Board has approved an alternative practice or where a special agreement has been entered into between the Program and a student.

---

4.4 Acceptable Use of Information Technology Resources Policy 

All members of the Queen’s community are bound by the Queen’s policy on the Acceptable Use of Information Technology (IT) Resources.  The policy states:

The use of Queen's University information technology (IT) resources must be consistent with the academic mission of the University. These IT resources are provided to support the teaching, learning, research and administrative activities of the Queen's community. As a member or guest of the Queen's community, you may have access to valuable internal and external networks and resources, and Sensitive Information, and you are expected to use these resources in a responsible, ethical, and legal manner. Your actions should not adversely affect the ability of others to use these resources, or compromise the security and privacy of sensitive information.

4.4.1 Submission of Electronic Assignments 

Students may be required to submit assignments electronically.  It is the responsibility of the student to ensure that all electronic submissions are corruption-free.

Any assignment that is detected to be carrying a corrupt file will be immediately destroyed, and the student must re-submit the assignment corruption-free. If the assignment is not re-submitted before the assignment deadline it will be marked “late.”

---

4.5 Examinations

4.5.1 Access to Examinations 

The term final examination paper refers to the final examination question paper in a course together with the graded answer paper written by the student. These documents, in accordance with the Senate Policy on Student Access to Final Examination Papers, must be retained by the professor or the School for a period of 12 months.

4.5.1.1 Informal Access 

Professors may informally review the final examination paper with a student who requests it and are encouraged to do so. However, access may not be granted before the final marks are released.

4.5.1.2 Formal Access

A student may obtain access to their final exam as part of an appeal process. This may be supervised access to, or a copy of, the final examination paper.  The student should contact the Program administration to arrange for formal access to their final exam.

4.5.2 Changes to Examination Time

Requests for changes to an individual examination time must be made to the Program Director as soon as the student is aware of a conflict. Normally, such requests will only be granted if extenuating circumstances (beyond the student’s control) will prevent the student from writing the exam at the scheduled time. 

The exam dates for the courses with exams will be posted well in advance of the date of the exam. The policies regarding exam locations and change of dates are set out below.

1. At least one month in advance of the first exam date, students will receive a survey from the Program administration through an online survey setting out the upcoming exam locations. Each student must choose their site preference no later than two weeks in advance of the first scheduled exam date, and this will become the default location for all subsequent exams.
2. Changes to the preferred exam location can be made up to two weeks prior to any subsequent exam by sending a request in writing to both the Program Manager and the Administrative Coordinator, Assignments and Exams at Queen’s. Students should understand that changes requested within two weeks of the exam may not be permitted.
3. All requests for changes to exam dates must meet the following criteria
   1. A written request for the change of date must be received by the Program Manager at Queen’s at least two weeks in advance of the exam; the request must clearly state the reason for the change
   2. All requests must be approved by the Program administration in consultation with the course professor; this process may require supporting documentation
   3. The student requesting the change of exam date must secure their own proctor and secure their own exam location and pay all associated costs. The student will be provided with a list of persons who qualify to be proctors for exams conducted by Queen’s
   4. In extenuating circumstances, changes to exam dates may be considered if the criteria set out in 1 and 2 above are not met.

---

4.6 Queen's University Student Code of Conduct

Queen’s University is dedicated to learning, intellectual inquiry, the dissemination and advancement of knowledge, personal and professional development, and good citizenship.  All students are required to read and adhere to Queen’s University Student Code of Conduct.

Students are expected to adhere to and promote the University’s core values of honesty, trust, fairness, respect and personal responsibility in all aspects of University life, academic and non-academic. These core values are intended to inform and guide student conduct as they foster mutual respect for the dignity, property, rights and well-being of others.

As a member of the Queen’s community, every student accepts the University’s policies, rules and procedures and acknowledges the right of the University to set standards of conduct, as well as the right of the University and/or its Authorized Agent(s) to impose sanctions for conduct found to have violated those standards.  

4.6.1 Professionalism and Facilities Etiquette

All study and work spaces provided by Smith School of Business should be treated with respect and care.  All students are expected to properly reserve space, use the facilities for the purposes for which they are intended, and to leave spaces clean, tidy, in the proper furniture configuration and with the room supplies.  

5: ACADEMIC DECISIONS AND APPEALS

Various types of academic decisions may be made by a course professor, Program Director, Academic Progress Committee, Academic Integrity Panel, Academic Appeals Committee and/or the University Student Appeal Board. 

The appeals process at Queen’s University is comprised of several levels of appeal by different appeal bodies.  In accordance with the Senate Student Academic Appeals Policy, the decision system is based on the principle that "decisions should generally be made by those who are most familiar with the context” ²

Appeals of academic decisions fall into four possible categories: appeals of grades (Section 5.1), appeals of other academic decisions (Section 5.2), appeals of academic standing and progression decisions (Section 5.3), and appeals of academic integrity decisions (Section 5.4). 

Note that it is the student’s responsibility to clearly establish that grounds for an appeal exist as the basis for an appeal.  Below the various decision-making bodies and their mandates are explained.

5.1 Appeals of Grades

Grades are determined by course professors.  Appeals of grades in courses (including assignments, examination papers, and final grades) are first handled at the course professor level. 

Examination papers and course marks of students, whose final grade in a course is marginally below a letter grade, and especially below a failing grade, are reviewed with special care by faculty members before such grades are assigned. Therefore, it is unlikely that such a grade is incorrect or unfair to the student.  However, if a student feels that a course grade or a portion of it has been unfairly assessed, they should first make an attempt to resolve the issue informally with the professor.

If the student feels that the issue remains unresolved, they should contact the Program Director who will initiate a formal grade review.  A review of the assignment or examination shall be conducted by two examiners appointed by the Program Director or designate; one examiner shall be the original professor or grader, if available. The review shall involve a re‐reading of the final examination or deliverable(s) in the course and a review of the student’s course record.

Requests for reconsideration of a course grade must be accompanied by payment of a fee of $100. This fee will be refunded to the student if, as a result of the review, a failing grade is raised to a pass or if a pass is raised by as much as five marks or to a higher letter grade.  Note that it is the responsibility of the student to preserve all exercises, papers, reports, and other graded material for the course and to submit a copy of these documents with the request for review. The scanned copy of any graded assignment or material returned to a student shall be deemed to be the original document for the purposes of this section.

The decision of the examiner(s) is final, and there is no further appeal available.

---

5.2 Appeals of Other Academic Decisions 

The Program Director makes some decisions for students facing special circumstances in the Program.  The student should request consideration as appropriate to the Program Director as soon as they are aware of a situation requiring such consideration.  Examples of such decisions could include: changing a course registration from one elective to another, or deferring an exam. 

Appeals of decisions by the Program Director are made to the Academic Progress Committee. 

---

5.3 Appeals of Academic Standing and Progression Decisions 

Students are considered to be in Good Academic Standing unless they have violated one or more of the Academic Regulations of the Program.  As noted, students who violate one or more of the Academic Regulations of the Program are normally required to withdraw from the Program.  In such a case, the Program Director will normally inform the student in writing that, because of their violation of one or more of the Regulations, they are required to withdraw from the Program. 

Appeals of these decisions are made to the Academic Progress Committee.

---

5.4 Appeals of Academic Integrity Decisions 

Course professors will normally investigate and make decisions regarding possible violations of academic integrity in their courses in accordance with the Smith School of Business Academic Integrity Policy and as set out in Section 4.1. 

Appeals of professors’ decisions regarding academic integrity are made to the Academic Integrity Panel. 

In cases where the Academic Integrity Panel is the initial decision maker, appeals are made to the Academic Appeals Committee.

---

5.5 The Academic Appeals Committee

The Smith School of Business Academic Appeals Committee (AAC) has jurisdiction over all matters related to academic appeals involving students registered in the School of Business (with the exception of the PhD and Master of Science programs). The AAC hears appeals of decisions made by Academic Progress Committee and the Academic Integrity Panel.

Normally, the AAC serves as a true appeal board, which is not empowered to substitute its own decision for that of the Academic Progress Committee or the Academic Integrity Panel, but rather reviews the decision of the previous decision-making body based on the same information available to the previous body at the time the decision was made.⁴

The AAC reviews the circumstances of the decision of the previous decision-maker to: ensure that the Academic Progress Committee or the Academic Integrity Panel did not exceed its jurisdiction; ensure that there was procedural fairness; ensure that there was appropriate consideration of extenuating circumstances; uphold the academic policies and principles reflected in the School’s and University’s regulations; and determine if the decision was reasonable.

In rendering a decision, the AAC may uphold the decision of the previous body, grant the student's appeal, or modify the original decision/sanction.  Any decision made by the AAC must be within the scope of the School’s regulations.

Appeals of decisions made by the AAC are made to the University Student Appeal Board.

---

5.6 The University Student Appeals Board

Students wishing to appeal a decision by the Academic Appeals Committee must make their intention known to the University Student Appeal Board (USAB).  The University Student Appeal Board is the final internal appeal body at Queen’s University.  Its mandate is outlined in the Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights and Discipline (SARD).

The decision of the USAB is final, and there is no further level of appeal.

5.6.1 Queen’s University Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights, and Discipline

All students should be familiar with their rights as established in the Senate Student Academic Appeals Policy 

---

²Senate Student Academic Appeals Policy, Introduction (p. 4).

³ In situations where new evidence becomes available which may have, or is likely to have, affected the original decision of the previous decision-maker (i.e. the APC or the AIP), the AAC will refer those cases back to the previous decision-maker.

⁴ Where the Academic Integrity Panel (AIP) was the initial decision-maker, the AAC will investigate an Academic Integrity case de novo.  

Class of 2024

1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

The purpose of the Academic Calendar is to acquaint students with the academic requirements, regulations, policies, procedures and expectations of the Program.  It is the responsibility of the student to read and understand the entire Academic Calendar.  Questions about any of its contents should be directed to the Program Director.

---

1.2 Acknowledgement of Territory

Queen’s University in Kingston is situated on traditional Anishinaabe and Haudenosaunee Territory. To acknowledge this traditional territory is to recognize its longer history, one predating the establishment of the earliest European colonies.  It is also to acknowledge this territory’s significance for the Indigenous peoples who lived, and continue to live, upon it – people whose practices and spiritualties were tied to the land and continue to develop in relationship to the territory and its other inhabitants today.  The Kingston Indigenous community continues to reflect the area’s Anishinaabek and Haudenosaunee roots.  There is also a significant Métis community and there are First Peoples from other Nations across Turtle Island present today.

SmithToronto operates on sacred land that has been a site of human activity for 15,000 years. This land is the territory of the Huron-Wendat and Petun First Nations, the Seneca, and most recently, the Mississaugas of the Credit River. The territory was the subject of the Dish With One Spoon Wampum Belt Covenant, an agreement between the Iroquois Confederacy and Confederacy of the Ojibwe and allied nations to peaceably share and care for the resources around the Great Lakes. Today, the meeting place of Toronto is still the home to many Indigenous people from across Turtle Island and we are grateful to have the opportunity to work in the community on this territory.

2: PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND GRADING

2.1 Jurisdiction

Students of Smith School of Business at Queen’s University are governed by the regulations, policies and practices of this institution.  
It is the responsibility of every student in the Program to read and understand these policies, regulations, and requirements as well as those of their home, exchange and double degree universities.  

---

2.2 Program Format

The Smith Master of Financial Innovation & Technology (“MFIT”) Program is approved by the Senate and Board of Trustees of the University, and by the Ontario Council for Graduate Studies.  Upon graduation, students receive a Master of Financial Innovation & Technology Degree.   

The Smith Master of Financial Innovation & Technology Program provides students with the opportunity to gain the educational and professional advantages of a Smith Program without interrupting a successful career. The program will focus on developing a unique combination of skills consisting of a deep understanding of financial models and data and technology. 

2.2.1 Program Delivery

The Smith Master of Financial Innovation & Technology Program holds classes on weeknights and weekends at SmithToronto, supplemented by two on-campus residency periods in Toronto and Kingston. All classes and residencies are held in-person.

At the beginning of the program, students are introduced to their Team Coach, network support staff, instructors, and program staff.

---

2.3 Timeframe

Once registered in the Program, the student is expected to complete all degree requirements without interruption.  The Program will be completed in 14 consecutive months, beginning in November and ending in December.

---

2.4 Degree Requirements and Courses

The Smith Master of Financial Innovation & Technology Program is a 14-month program in which students complete 14 courses (36 credits), all of which are mandatory courses.  To be eligible for graduation, students must complete all courses in the Program in the year in which they are registered, and uphold and/or meet each of the Academic Regulations (Section 3 of this document).  

2.4.1 Required and Elective Courses
All required courses for the Program must be completed at Smith in the year that the student is registered in the Program. 

2.4.1.1 Required courses
All students must complete the following required courses in accordance with the Academic Regulations set out in Section 3 of this document.  

MFIN 821 Corp Fin & Fin Stmt Anls I

MFIT 822 Creating New Ventures           

MFIT 824 Designing Digital Innovation           

MFIT 846 Banking Disrupted           

MFIT 892 Crypto-Economics and Payments           

MFIT 841 Digital Capital Markets           

MFIT 842 Automated Investing           

MFIT 848 Team-Based Project Course           

MFIT 893 Fin Data Privacy & Security           

MMA 803 Analytics Ethics and Policy          

MMA 860 Acquisition and Management of Data          

MMA 863 Introduction to Analytical Modelling          

MMA 867 Predictive Modelling          

MMA 869 Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence

2.4.2 Course Substitutions

Students must complete all required courses at Smith within the required timeframe to graduate from the Program. 

If extenuating circumstances prevent a student from completing the Program in the required timeframe, the student will be required to complete outstanding courses as directed by the Program Director or Academic Progress Committee.  Normally, if one or more of the missed courses is not offered again in the year the student is registered in the Program, the student will be permitted to take the course in the subsequent year when the course is offered again.

2.4.3 Auditing Courses
A student may request to audit a course.  A formal written request to audit must be made to the Program Director at least seven days before the first session of the course to be audited.  Requests to audit courses will be considered depending on space, professor approval and other relevant course-specific factors.  

---

2.5 Grading

2.5.1 Queen’s University Grading 

The grading system for courses in the Queen's Program is: 

Grading (Business)

Letter Grade	Grade Point	Percentage
A+	4.3	90-100
A	4.0	85-89.9
A-	3.7	80-84.9
B+	3.3	77-79.9
B	3.0	73-76.9
B-	2.7	70-72.9
C+	2.3	67-69.9
C	2.0	63-66.9
C-	1.7	60-62.9
D+	1.3	57-59.9
D	1.0	53-56.9
D-	0.7	50-52.9
F	0.0	0-49.9

Other academic entries which may be assigned are: 

System of Grading

Letter Grade	Description
P	Pass; no grade assigned
FR	Failure with review, grade will be revised
CR	Credit
IN	Incomplete
GD	Grade deferred
AG	Aegrotat*
RTW	Required to withdraw
NG	Not graded; first term course of a multi-term course
AU	Audit
TR	Transfer credit, no grade assigned
DR	Course dropped
NEP	Not eligible to proceed
IP	In progress

*Aegrotat: An academic entry which provides an estimated final grade or, if that is not possible, credit for a course without a grade because of extenuating circumstances beyond the student’s control that prevented the student from completing all work of the course, particularly the final examination. Normally at least 60 per cent of the work to be evaluated in the course (assignments, midterms, final examination, as specified in the course). 

Requests for AG or CR standing should be made to the Program Director.

2.5.2 Grading Specifications
All final marks, including those assigned after special examinations, may be based on the results of formal examinations and on grades obtained from other work throughout the course, which may include essays, exercises, reports, presentations, class tests/quizzes, and class participation or other work. 

At the beginning of each course, the professor will provide a clear statement of the basis on which the final mark will be assessed. All work assigned and the weight that it will contribute to the final mark will be specified.  Normally there is both individual and teamwork included in course assessments.

2.5.3 Class Participation
Class participation grades are allocated in some courses. Professors will specify the specific form and opportunities for participation marks at the start of the course.  Some examples include contributions to class discussions or discussion boards, attendance, timely completion of assigned work, or other relevant behaviours determined by the professor.

3: ACADEMIC REGULATIONS AND STANDINGS

Academic Regulations exist to maintain the standards of the Program, and to ensure the candidates of the Program have the mandatory knowledge and experience to merit receiving the Degree.  Degrees are awarded according to the requirements and processes set out in the Academic Regulations.

Every student is responsible for knowing and meeting or upholding the Academic Regulations of the Program in order to progress through the Program and ultimately be eligible for the Degree.  The Academic Regulations below are currently in effect.  Regulations are consistently reviewed and may change from time to time.  Any changes that take place during the academic year will be communicated to students; it remains the student’s responsibility to be aware of any such changes.  

3.1 Academic Regulations

Each candidate for the Degree must successfully meet or achieve the Regulations below in order to be in Good Academic Standing, to progress through the Program, and to be eligible for graduation from the Program.  In a case where a student violates any one of the Regulations, that student is normally required to withdraw from the Program (see section 3.2 for further information).  

Every student must achieve the following:

3.1.1 Complete Program Curriculum  
The student must complete all components of the curriculum as outlined in Section 2.

3.1.2 Overall Minimum GPA
The student must achieve a cumulative GPA of at least 2.7 (B-) including all courses taken in the Program.

3.1.3 Minimum Course Grades
The student may obtain final grades of less than 2.0 (C) in no more than the equivalent of 2 full courses (6 credits) throughout the Program.

3.1.4 No Failures
The student must obtain a final grade of at least 0.7 (D-) in each course.

3.1.5 Attendance
The student may not miss more than 25% of class sessions of any course. 

Class attendance is monitored and concerns related to attendance will be addressed with the student.

---

3.2 Academic Standing

The following Academic Standings may apply, depending on individual circumstances:

3.2.1 Good Academic Standing
In order to progress through the Program and to be eligible for the Degree, a student must be in Good Academic Standing.  A student is considered to be in Good Academic Standing when they uphold the Academic Regulations set out in Section 3.1 above. A student who fails to uphold any one of the Academic Regulations is no longer in Good Academic Standing, and is normally required to withdraw from the Program.  The student is considered to be in Academic Jeopardy until a decision is made by the appropriate body.  

3.2.2 Academic Jeopardy
A student who fails to meet any one or more of the Academic Regulations is deemed to be in Academic Jeopardy until a decision is made about their situation.   Students in this situation will first be reviewed by the Program Director.  In some cases an informal resolution may be possible (for example, an opportunity to re-take an exam if the student has official evidence of being gravely ill on the day of the exam) and, if successful, the student may return to Good Academic Standing. In cases where an informal resolution is not possible, the Program Director will inform the student in writing of the requirement to withdraw from the Program, subject to the student’s right of appeal.

3.2.3 Academic Probation
A student who has failed to meet one or more of the Academic Regulations and who has successfully appealed to the Academic Progress Committee may be permitted to continue in the Program, on Academic Probation, subject to specific terms, conditions, standards and timeframes tailored to the situation. A student who successfully completes the conditions of their Academic Probation will be released from Academic Probation and return to Good Academic Standing.  A student who fails to meet the conditions of their Academic Probation will normally be required to withdraw from the Program, subject to their right of appeal.  

3.2.4 Requirement to Withdraw 
A student who has failed to meet any one or more of the Academic Regulations is normally required to withdraw from the Program, subject to their right of appeal (see section 5).  Further, a student who fails to meet the conditions of their Academic Probation will normally be required to withdraw from the Program.

3.2.5 Effective Date of Sanctions
Sanctions or adverse academic decisions, such as Academic Probation (and its terms and conditions) or a requirement to withdraw, shall take effect as soon as the student accepts the sanction OR exhausts (or allows to lapse) their right to appeal to the next level in accordance with Section 20 of Queen’s University Senate Policy on Student Academic Appeals:

1. Ordinarily, no sanction, penalty or requirement to withdraw shall be put into effect until the student affected has either exhausted all channels of appeal or has allowed the time for appeal to lapse. For the purpose of this provision, the University will normally consider an adverse academic decision to be a sanction.
2. Notwithstanding subsection (1), where an academic unit determines that the interests of third parties may be prejudiced by the continued enrollment of a student in a course or program, the unit may decide that pending an appeal from an adverse academic decision, the student should not be permitted to continue in the course or program, or may be precluded from progressing to the next academic stage.
3. A student who is subject to suspension from a program under subsection (2) may request that the Chair of the appellate body with jurisdiction over the matter expedite the hearing of the appeal. This request may result in a direction abridging the time for filing of documents, or other interim or preliminary direction made pursuant to Section 36 of Queen’s University Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights and Discipline.

4: ACADEMIC STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS

4.1 Academic Integrity 

Queen’s University is dedicated to creating a scholarly community free to explore a range of ideas, to build and advance knowledge, and to share the ideas and knowledge that emerge from a range of intellectual pursuits.

Queen’s students, faculty, administrators and staff therefore all have responsibilities for supporting and upholding the fundamental values of academic integrity. Academic integrity is constituted by the five core fundamental values of honesty, trust, fairness, respect and responsibility (see International Centre for Academic Integrity) and by the quality of courage. These values and qualities are central to the building, nurturing and sustaining of an academic community in which all members of the community will thrive. Adherence to the values expressed through academic integrity forms a foundation for the "freedom of inquiry and exchange of ideas" essential to the intellectual life of the University.

The following statements from “The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity” (2nd edition), developed by the International Center for Academic Integrity (ICAI), contextualize these values and qualities:

1. Honesty: Academic communities of integrity advance the quest for truth and knowledge through intellectual and personal honesty in learning, teaching, research, and service.
2. Trust: Academic communities of integrity both foster and rely upon climates of mutual trust. Climates of trust encourage and support the free exchange of ideas which in turn allows scholarly inquiry to reach its fullest potential.
3. Fairness: Academic communities of integrity establish clear and transparent expectations, standards, and practices to support fairness in the interactions of students, faculty, and administrators.
4. Respect: Academic communities of integrity value the interactive, cooperative, participatory nature of learning. They honor, value, and consider diverse opinions and ideas.
5. Responsibility: Academic communities of integrity rest upon foundations of personal accountability coupled with the willingness of individuals and groups to lead by example, uphold mutually agreed-upon standards, and take action when they encounter wrongdoing.
6. Courage: To develop and sustain communities of integrity, it takes more than simply believing in the fundamental values. Translating the values from talking points into action -- standing up for them in the face of pressure and adversity — requires determination, commitment, and courage.

Students are responsible for familiarizing themselves with and adhering to the regulations concerning academic integrity. General information on academic integrity is available at Academic Integrity @ Queen's University, along with School specific information below.

4.1.1 Departures from Academic Integrity

A departure from academic integrity includes any deliberate attempt to gain unfair advantage academically for oneself or others. All forms of departure from academic integrity are considered serious offences within the University community. The following defines the domain of relevant acts without providing an exhaustive list:

4.1.1.1 Plagiarism 

Allowing it to be thought that another's ideas or phrasings are one's own by failing to provide proper acknowledgement. Some examples are:

• Copying and pasting from the internet
• Copying a printed source or other resource without proper acknowledgement
• Copying from another student in the same or different year of the Program or another Program
• Copying from another’s test paper
• Using direct quotations or large sections of paraphrased material in an assignment without appropriate acknowledgement
• Buying term papers or other assignments and submitting them as one's own
• Submitting the same piece of work in more than one course without the permission of the instructors
• Obtaining a copy of, or information about, a test or exam from an earlier section of the course and writing the test or exam later in the day or subsequent days.

4.1.1.2 Use of Unauthorized Materials

• Possessing or using unauthorized study materials or aids during a test
• Copying from another's test paper
• Using an unauthorized calculator or other aids during a test
• Unauthorized removal of materials from the library, or deliberate concealment of library materials
• Obtaining materials such as answer keys and using them to obtain an unfair advantage.

4.1.1.3 Facilitation

• Enabling another's breach of academic integrity
• Making information available to another student, such as knowingly allowing one's essay or assignment to be copied by someone else, giving a copy of a test or exam to a student writing the same test or exam later in the day or subsequent days
• Selling or distributing term papers or other assignments
• Knowingly assisting another person to conceal their departure from academic integrity.

4.1.1.4 Unauthorized Collaboration

• Working with others, without the specific permission of the instructor, on assignments that will be submitted for a grade
• This applies to in-class or take-home tests, papers, or homework assignments. Students may not collaborate without the instructor’s authorization.

4.1.1.5 Forgery 

• Utilizing counterfeit documents or statements (e.g. creating or altering a transcript, medical note or other official documents).

4.1.1.6 Falsification

• Misrepresentation of one's self, one's work or one's relation to the University
• Altering transcripts or other official documents relating to student records
• Impersonating someone in an examination or test
• Submitting a take-home examination written, in whole or in part, by someone else
• Fabricating or falsifying research data or source material (whether by commission or by omission)
• Allowing someone else to do research work without the knowledge and approval of the instructor
• Failing to appropriately recognize contributions of others
• Attributing authorship of work to persons other than those who have contributed to the work in a meaningful way.

4.1.2 Process for Investigating Suspected Departures from Academic Integrity

The Smith School of Business Policy on Academic Integrity sets out complete procedures and processes for handling suspected departures from academic integrity.  Students are responsible for familiarizing themselves with the policy.  Normally, where a course professor has a concern about a possible departure from academic integrity, the professor will notify the student and investigate in accordance with Smith policy.  The student will have an opportunity to respond and their response will be considered part of the evidence in the case. 

In complex cases the professor may refer the case to the Smith School of Business Academic Integrity Panel for investigation.  In this situation, the Academic Integrity Panel will notify the student of the potential departure and investigate in accordance with Smith policy. 

In cases of a subsequent departure from academic integrity (that is, where there is a previous departure on record for the student), the professor will make a finding but refer the case to the Academic Integrity Panel for the determination of a sanction.     

4.1.3 Sanctions for Departures from Academic Integrity

Following the investigation of the suspected departure from Academic Integrity, the professor/Academic Integrity Panel will either: i) make a finding of a departure from academic integrity and impose a sanction (or refer the matter to the AI Panel for sanction); or ii) determine there was no departure and destroy all evidence of the notice and investigation.

Any student who is found to have committed a violation of academic integrity may face a range of sanctions, including but not limited to: receiving a warning, a grade of zero on the assignment, a failure in the course, a recommendation to Queen's Senate that the student be required to withdraw from the University for a period of time, or that a degree be rescinded. 

Records of findings of departures from AI are kept in the Dean’s Office and in the Program Office.  Students who are found to have subsequent violations of academic integrity will normally face progressively more serious sanctions.

---

4.2 Illness and Extenuating Circumstances Policies

4.2.1 Illness 

A student who claims illness as a reason for missing academic obligations is responsible for informing the professor and the Program Director and may be required to provide evidence of illness.  In keeping with University Academic Consideration for Students in Extenuating Circumstances Policy, a student suffering from a short-term illness should submit the appropriate form outlining their needs. 

A notification of absence from an examination must be accompanied by documentation as follows:

• in cases of illness when a student is under the care of a physician, the student should provide a note from the physician. Retroactive doctors’ notes (i.e. notes dated from physicians after the illness) are not acceptable.
• If a student is ill, but not under the care of a physician prior to and during an exam, they can provide the appropriate form(s) outlining their situation.

As a matter of academic integrity, a student is responsible for making an honest declaration concerning the nature of their illness and its impact on their academic obligations.  False declarations may be investigated under the Smith Academic Integrity Policy.

4.2.2 Extenuating Circumstances 

The Program adheres to Queen’s Academic Consideration for Students in Extenuating Circumstances Policy and the principle of a good faith response to requests for consideration.

Extenuating circumstances means a personal circumstance beyond the student’s control that has a direct and substantial impact on the student’s ability to meet essential academic requirements or expectations.  Extenuating circumstances include but are not limited to a sudden or acute physical or mental illness, serious injury to self or significant others, bereavement, a traumatic event, or other serious personal/family crisis.  Extenuating circumstances may also include officially representing the university at a sanctioned event or through an invitation to participate in an event as a distinguished guest (e.g. national tournament, Olympics).

 A student who is unable to satisfy the requirements of a course or the Program due to extenuating circumstances must notify the Program Director in writing as soon as possible.  Students may submit the appropriate form(s).

If the student is requesting a modification of the Program requirements, a formal written request should be submitted to the Program Director.  The request for modification should include an explanation of the connection between the effects of extenuating circumstances on the academic performance, as well as the remedy the student is seeking.

The Program Director will respond to the student’s request for consideration promptly.  The Program is committed to responding to students in a fair and consistent manner, taking into account the specific individual circumstances.  The Program is also committed to upholding academic standards and ensuring that essential academic requirements are met.

4.2.3 Official Documentation 

Official documentation, including notes from health care professionals, need not outline the specific details of the student’s condition, but must clearly indicate ways in which the circumstances directly affect the student’s performance, and verify that these effects were substantial enough to cause the academic disruption.  Information about the start, duration and present state of the condition or circumstances, as well as a clear statement on whether the condition or circumstances have either improved or are being managed so that they will not have a significant detrimental effect on future academic performance, are essential.

Documents submitted may be verified by the Program administration.  False statements or documents may be investigated in accordance with the Smith Policy on Academic Integrity.

4.2.4 Unresolved Circumstances

The appeals process does not compensate for circumstances that the student is unable to resolve, or for which the student is unwilling to actively seek accommodation. In addition, the appeals process does not compensate for circumstances that are actively being accommodated, for example where a student’s permanent disabilities are being accommodated through Queen’s Student Accessibility Services Office.

Multiple appeals citing the same circumstances will be reviewed very closely. This review may include, with the permission of the student, consultation with the appropriate professionals involved to obtain more detailed information. In order for such an appeal to succeed, there must be convincing evidence that the circumstances that affected the student’s academic performance will be resolved within a reasonable timeline, or will be appropriately managed on an ongoing basis.

---

4.3 Language

In accordance with Queen’s University Language Policy, examinations and assignments are to be submitted in English, except where a Faculty Board has approved an alternative practice or where a special agreement has been entered into between the Program and a student.

---

4.4 Acceptable Use of Information Technology Resources Policy 

All members of the Queen’s community are bound by the Queen’s policy on the Acceptable Use of Information Technology (IT) Resources.  The policy states:

The use of Queen's University information technology (IT) resources must be consistent with the academic mission of the University. These IT resources are provided to support the teaching, learning, research and administrative activities of the Queen's community. As a member or guest of the Queen's community, you may have access to valuable internal and external networks and resources, and Sensitive Information, and you are expected to use these resources in a responsible, ethical, and legal manner. Your actions should not adversely affect the ability of others to use these resources, or compromise the security and privacy of sensitive information.

4.4.1 Submission of Electronic Assignments 

Students may be required to submit assignments electronically.  It is the responsibility of the student to ensure that all electronic submissions are corruption-free.

Any assignment that is detected to be carrying a corrupt file will be immediately destroyed, and the student must re-submit the assignment corruption-free. If the assignment is not re-submitted before the assignment deadline it will be marked “late.”

---

4.5 Examinations

4.5.1 Access to Examinations 

The term final examination paper refers to the final examination question paper in a course together with the graded answer paper written by the student. These documents, in accordance with the Senate Policy on Student Access to Final Examination Papers, must be retained by the professor or the School for a period of 12 months.

4.5.1.1 Informal Access 

Professors may informally review the final examination paper with a student who requests it and are encouraged to do so. However, access may not be granted before the final marks are released.

4.5.1.2 Formal Access

A student may obtain access to their final exam as part of an appeal process. This may be supervised access to, or a copy of, the final examination paper.  The student should contact the Program administration to arrange for formal access to their final exam.

4.5.2 Changes to Examination Time

Requests for changes to an individual examination time must be made to the Program Director as soon as the student is aware of a conflict. Normally, such requests will only be granted if extenuating circumstances (beyond the student’s control) will prevent the student from writing the exam at the scheduled time. 

The exam dates for the courses with exams will be posted well in advance of the date of the exam. The policies regarding exam locations and change of dates are set out below.

1. At least one month in advance of the first exam date, students will receive a survey from the Program administration through an online survey setting out the upcoming exam locations. Each student must choose their site preference no later than two weeks in advance of the first scheduled exam date, and this will become the default location for all subsequent exams.
2. Changes to the preferred exam location can be made up to two weeks prior to any subsequent exam by sending a request in writing to both the Program Manager and the Administrative Coordinator, Assignments and Exams at Queen’s. Students should understand that changes requested within two weeks of the exam may not be permitted.
3. All requests for changes to exam dates must meet the following criteria
   1. A written request for the change of date must be received by the Program Manager at Queen’s at least two weeks in advance of the exam; the request must clearly state the reason for the change
   2. All requests must be approved by the Program administration in consultation with the course professor; this process may require supporting documentation
   3. The student requesting the change of exam date must secure their own proctor and secure their own exam location and pay all associated costs. The student will be provided with a list of persons who qualify to be proctors for exams conducted by Queen’s
   4. In extenuating circumstances, changes to exam dates may be considered if the criteria set out in 1 and 2 above are not met.

---

4.6 Queen's University Student Code of Conduct

Queen’s University is dedicated to learning, intellectual inquiry, the dissemination and advancement of knowledge, personal and professional development, and good citizenship.  All students are required to read and adhere to Queen’s University Student Code of Conduct.

Students are expected to adhere to and promote the University’s core values of honesty, trust, fairness, respect and personal responsibility in all aspects of University life, academic and non-academic. These core values are intended to inform and guide student conduct as they foster mutual respect for the dignity, property, rights and well-being of others.

As a member of the Queen’s community, every student accepts the University’s policies, rules and procedures and acknowledges the right of the University to set standards of conduct, as well as the right of the University and/or its Authorized Agent(s) to impose sanctions for conduct found to have violated those standards.  

4.6.1 Professionalism and Facilities Etiquette

All study and work spaces provided by Smith School of Business should be treated with respect and care.  All students are expected to properly reserve space, use the facilities for the purposes for which they are intended, and to leave spaces clean, tidy, in the proper furniture configuration and with the room supplies.  

5: ACADEMIC DECISIONS AND APPEALS

Various types of academic decisions may be made by a course professor, Program Director, Academic Progress Committee, Academic Integrity Panel, Academic Appeals Committee and/or the University Student Appeal Board. 

The appeals process at Queen’s University is comprised of several levels of appeal by different appeal bodies.  In accordance with the Senate Student Academic Appeals Policy, the decision system is based on the principle that "decisions should generally be made by those who are most familiar with the context” ²

Appeals of academic decisions fall into four possible categories: appeals of grades (Section 5.1), appeals of other academic decisions (Section 5.2), appeals of academic standing and progression decisions (Section 5.3), and appeals of academic integrity decisions (Section 5.4). 

Note that it is the student’s responsibility to clearly establish that grounds for an appeal exist as the basis for an appeal.  Below the various decision-making bodies and their mandates are explained.

5.1 Appeals of Grades

Grades are determined by course professors.  Appeals of grades in courses (including assignments, examination papers, and final grades) are first handled at the course professor level. 

Examination papers and course marks of students, whose final grade in a course is marginally below a letter grade, and especially below a failing grade, are reviewed with special care by faculty members before such grades are assigned. Therefore, it is unlikely that such a grade is incorrect or unfair to the student.  However, if a student feels that a course grade or a portion of it has been unfairly assessed, they should first make an attempt to resolve the issue informally with the professor.

If the student feels that the issue remains unresolved, they should contact the Program Director who will initiate a formal grade review.  A review of the assignment or examination shall be conducted by two examiners appointed by the Program Director or designate; one examiner shall be the original professor or grader, if available. The review shall involve a re‐reading of the final examination or deliverable(s) in the course and a review of the student’s course record.

Requests for reconsideration of a course grade must be accompanied by payment of a fee of $100. This fee will be refunded to the student if, as a result of the review, a failing grade is raised to a pass or if a pass is raised by as much as five marks or to a higher letter grade.  Note that it is the responsibility of the student to preserve all exercises, papers, reports, and other graded material for the course and to submit a copy of these documents with the request for review. The scanned copy of any graded assignment or material returned to a student shall be deemed to be the original document for the purposes of this section.

The decision of the examiner(s) is final, and there is no further appeal available.

---

5.2 Appeals of Other Academic Decisions 

The Program Director makes some decisions for students facing special circumstances in the Program.  The student should request consideration as appropriate to the Program Director as soon as they are aware of a situation requiring such consideration.  Examples of such decisions could include: changing a course registration from one elective to another, or deferring an exam. 

Appeals of decisions by the Program Director are made to the Academic Progress Committee. 

---

5.3 Appeals of Academic Standing and Progression Decisions 

Students are considered to be in Good Academic Standing unless they have violated one or more of the Academic Regulations of the Program.  As noted, students who violate one or more of the Academic Regulations of the Program are normally required to withdraw from the Program.  In such a case, the Program Director will normally inform the student in writing that, because of their violation of one or more of the Regulations, they are required to withdraw from the Program. 

Appeals of these decisions are made to the Academic Progress Committee.

---

5.4 Appeals of Academic Integrity Decisions 

Course professors will normally investigate and make decisions regarding possible violations of academic integrity in their courses in accordance with the Smith School of Business Academic Integrity Policy and as set out in Section 4.1. 

Appeals of professors’ decisions regarding academic integrity are made to the Academic Integrity Panel. 

In cases where the Academic Integrity Panel is the initial decision maker, appeals are made to the Academic Appeals Committee.

---

5.5 The Academic Appeals Committee

The Smith School of Business Academic Appeals Committee (AAC) has jurisdiction over all matters related to academic appeals involving students registered in the School of Business (with the exception of the PhD and Master of Science programs). The AAC hears appeals of decisions made by Academic Progress Committee and the Academic Integrity Panel.

Normally, the AAC serves as a true appeal board, which is not empowered to substitute its own decision for that of the Academic Progress Committee or the Academic Integrity Panel, but rather reviews the decision of the previous decision-making body based on the same information available to the previous body at the time the decision was made.⁴

The AAC reviews the circumstances of the decision of the previous decision-maker to: ensure that the Academic Progress Committee or the Academic Integrity Panel did not exceed its jurisdiction; ensure that there was procedural fairness; ensure that there was appropriate consideration of extenuating circumstances; uphold the academic policies and principles reflected in the School’s and University’s regulations; and determine if the decision was reasonable.

In rendering a decision, the AAC may uphold the decision of the previous body, grant the student's appeal, or modify the original decision/sanction.  Any decision made by the AAC must be within the scope of the School’s regulations.

Appeals of decisions made by the AAC are made to the University Student Appeal Board.

---

5.6 The University Student Appeals Board

Students wishing to appeal a decision by the Academic Appeals Committee must make their intention known to the University Student Appeal Board (USAB).  The University Student Appeal Board is the final internal appeal body at Queen’s University.  Its mandate is outlined in the Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights and Discipline (SARD).

The decision of the USAB is final, and there is no further level of appeal.

5.6.1 Queen’s University Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights, and Discipline

All students should be familiar with their rights as established in the Senate Student Academic Appeals Policy 

---

²Senate Student Academic Appeals Policy, Introduction (p. 4).

³ In situations where new evidence becomes available which may have, or is likely to have, affected the original decision of the previous decision-maker (i.e. the APC or the AIP), the AAC will refer those cases back to the previous decision-maker.

⁴ Where the Academic Integrity Panel (AIP) was the initial decision-maker, the AAC will investigate an Academic Integrity case de novo.  

Class of 2023

1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

The purpose of the Academic Calendar is to acquaint students with the academic requirements, regulations, policies, procedures and expectations of the Program.  It is the responsibility of the student to read and understand the entire Academic Calendar.  Questions about any of its contents should be directed to the Program Director.

---

1.2 Acknowledgement of Territory

Queen’s University in Kingston is situated on traditional Anishinaabe and Haudenosaunee Territory. To acknowledge this traditional territory is to recognize its longer history, one predating the establishment of the earliest European colonies.  It is also to acknowledge this territory’s significance for the Indigenous peoples who lived, and continue to live, upon it – people whose practices and spiritualties were tied to the land and continue to develop in relationship to the territory and its other inhabitants today.  The Kingston Indigenous community continues to reflect the area’s Anishinaabek and Haudenosaunee roots.  There is also a significant Métis community and there are First Peoples from other Nations across Turtle Island present today.

SmithToronto operates on sacred land that has been a site of human activity for 15,000 years. This land is the territory of the Huron-Wendat and Petun First Nations, the Seneca, and most recently, the Mississaugas of the Credit River. The territory was the subject of the Dish With One Spoon Wampum Belt Covenant, an agreement between the Iroquois Confederacy and Confederacy of the Ojibwe and allied nations to peaceably share and care for the resources around the Great Lakes. Today, the meeting place of Toronto is still the home to many Indigenous people from across Turtle Island and we are grateful to have the opportunity to work in the community on this territory.

2: PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND GRADING

2.1 Jurisdiction

Students of Smith School of Business at Queen’s University are governed by the regulations, policies and practices of this institution.  
It is the responsibility of every student in the Program to read and understand these policies, regulations, and requirements as well as those of their home, exchange and double degree universities.  

---

2.2 Program Format

The Smith Master of Financial Innovation & Technology (“MFIT”) Program is approved by the Senate and Board of Trustees of the University, and by the Ontario Council for Graduate Studies.  Upon graduation, students receive a Master of Financial Innovation & Technology Degree.   

The Smith Master of Financial Innovation & Technology Program provides students with the opportunity to gain the educational and professional advantages of a Smith Program without interrupting a successful career. The program will focus on developing a unique combination of skills consisting of a deep understanding of financial models and data and technology. 

2.2.1 Program Delivery
The Smith Master of Financial Innovation & Technology Program holds classes on weeknights and weekends at SmithToronto, supplemented by two on-campus residency periods in Kingston. All classes and residencies are remote until Health & Safety regulations allow for in class sessions to resume, due to Covid-19.

At the beginning of the program, students are introduced to their Team Coach, network support staff, instructors, and program staff.

---

2.3 Timeframe

Once registered in the Program, the student is expected to complete all degree requirements without interruption.  The Program will be completed in 12 to 13 consecutive months, beginning in November and ending in December.

---

2.4 Degree Requirements and Courses

The Smith Master of Financial Innovation & Technology Program is a 12 to 13-month program in which students complete 15 courses (36 credits), all of which are mandatory courses.  To be eligible for graduation, students must complete all courses in the Program in the year in which they are registered, and uphold and/or meet each of the Academic Regulations (Section 3 of this document).  

2.4.1 Required and Elective Courses
All required courses for the Program must be completed at Smith in the year that the student is registered in the Program. 

2.4.1.1 Required courses
All students must complete the following required courses in accordance with the Academic Regulations set out in Section 3 of this document.  
MFIN 821 Corp Fin & Fin Stmt Anls I
MFIT 822 Creating New Ventures
MFIT 824 Designing Digital Innovation
MFIT 846 Banking Disrupted
MFIT 892 Crypto-Economics and Payments
MFIT 841 Digital Capital Markets
MFIT 842 Automated Investing
MFIT 848 Team-Based Project Course
MMA 803 Analytics Ethics and Policy
MMA 860 Acquisition and Management of Data
MMA 863 Introduction to Analytical Modelling
MMA 867 Predictive Modelling
MMAI 869 Machine Learning and AI Technology 
 
2.4.2 Course Substitutions
Students must complete all required courses at Smith within the required timeframe to graduate from the Program. 

If extenuating circumstances prevent a student from completing the Program in the required timeframe, the student will be required to complete outstanding courses as directed by the Program Director or Academic Progress Committee.  Normally, if one or more of the missed courses is not offered again in the year the student is registered in the Program, the student will be permitted to take the course in the subsequent year when the course is offered again.

2.4.3 Auditing Courses
A student may request to audit a course.  A formal written request to audit must be made to the Program Director at least seven days before the first session of the course to be audited.  Requests to audit courses will be considered depending on space, professor approval and other relevant course-specific factors.  

---

2.5 Grading

2.5.1 Queen’s University Grading 

The grading system for courses in the Queen's Program is: 

Grading (Business)

Letter Grade	Grade Point	Percentage
A+	4.3	90-100
A	4.0	85-89.9
A-	3.7	80-84.9
B+	3.3	77-79.9
B	3.0	73-76.9
B-	2.7	70-72.9
C+	2.3	67-69.9
C	2.0	63-66.9
C-	1.7	60-62.9
D+	1.3	57-59.9
D	1.0	53-56.9
D-	0.7	50-52.9
F	0.0	0-49.9

Other academic entries which may be assigned are: 

System of Grading

Letter Grade	Description
P	Pass; no grade assigned
FR	Failure with review, grade will be revised
CR	Credit
IN	Incomplete
GD	Grade deferred
AG	Aegrotat*
RTW	Required to withdraw
NG	Not graded; first term course of a multi-term course
AU	Audit
TR	Transfer credit, no grade assigned
DR	Course dropped
NEP	Not eligible to proceed
IP	In progress

*Aegrotat: An academic entry which provides an estimated final grade or, if that is not possible, credit for a course without a grade because of extenuating circumstances beyond the student’s control that prevented the student from completing all work of the course, particularly the final examination. Normally at least 60 per cent of the work to be evaluated in the course (assignments, midterms, final examination, as specified in the course). 

Requests for AG or CR standing should be made to the Program Director.

2.5.2 Grading Specifications
All final marks, including those assigned after special examinations, may be based on the results of formal examinations and on grades obtained from other work throughout the course, which may include essays, exercises, reports, presentations, class tests/quizzes, and class participation or other work. 

At the beginning of each course, the professor will provide a clear statement of the basis on which the final mark will be assessed. All work assigned and the weight that it will contribute to the final mark will be specified.  Normally there is both individual and teamwork included in course assessments.

2.5.3 Class Participation
Class participation grades are allocated in some courses. Professors will specify the specific form and opportunities for participation marks at the start of the course.  Some examples include contributions to class discussions or discussion boards, attendance, timely completion of assigned work, or other relevant behaviours determined by the professor.

3: ACADEMIC REGULATIONS AND STANDINGS

Academic Regulations exist to maintain the standards of the Program, and to ensure the candidates of the Program have the mandatory knowledge and experience to merit receiving the Degree.  Degrees are awarded according to the requirements and processes set out in the Academic Regulations.

Every student is responsible for knowing and meeting or upholding the Academic Regulations of the Program in order to progress through the Program and ultimately be eligible for the Degree.  The Academic Regulations below are currently in effect.  Regulations are consistently reviewed and may change from time to time.  Any changes that take place during the academic year will be communicated to students; it remains the student’s responsibility to be aware of any such changes.  

3.1 Academic Regulations

Each candidate for the Degree must successfully meet or achieve the Regulations below in order to be in Good Academic Standing, to progress through the Program, and to be eligible for graduation from the Program.  In a case where a student violates any one of the Regulations, that student is normally required to withdraw from the Program (see section 3.2 for further information).  

Every student must achieve the following:

3.1.1 Complete Program Curriculum  
The student must complete all components of the curriculum as outlined in Section 2.

3.1.2 Overall Minimum GPA
The student must achieve a cumulative GPA of at least 2.7 (B-) including all courses taken in the Program.

3.1.3 Minimum Course Grades
The student may obtain final grades of less than 2.0 (C) in no more than the equivalent of 2 full courses (6 credits) throughout the Program.

3.1.4 No Failures
The student must obtain a final grade of at least 0.7 (D-) in each course.

3.1.5 Attendance
The student may not miss more than 25% of class sessions of any course. 

Class attendance is monitored and concerns related to attendance will be addressed with the student.

---

3.2 Academic Standing

The following Academic Standings may apply, depending on individual circumstances:

3.2.1 Good Academic Standing
In order to progress through the Program and to be eligible for the Degree, a student must be in Good Academic Standing.  A student is considered to be in Good Academic Standing when they uphold the Academic Regulations set out in Section 3.1 above. A student who fails to uphold any one of the Academic Regulations is no longer in Good Academic Standing, and is normally required to withdraw from the Program.  The student is considered to be in Academic Jeopardy until a decision is made by the appropriate body.  

3.2.2 Academic Jeopardy
A student who fails to meet any one or more of the Academic Regulations is deemed to be in Academic Jeopardy until a decision is made about their situation.   Students in this situation will first be reviewed by the Program Director.  In some cases an informal resolution may be possible (for example, an opportunity to re-take an exam if the student has official evidence of being gravely ill on the day of the exam) and, if successful, the student may return to Good Academic Standing. In cases where an informal resolution is not possible, the Program Director will inform the student in writing of the requirement to withdraw from the Program, subject to the student’s right of appeal.

3.2.3 Academic Probation
A student who has failed to meet one or more of the Academic Regulations and who has successfully appealed to the Academic Progress Committee may be permitted to continue in the Program, on Academic Probation, subject to specific terms, conditions, standards and timeframes tailored to the situation. A student who successfully completes the conditions of their Academic Probation will be released from Academic Probation and return to Good Academic Standing.  A student who fails to meet the conditions of their Academic Probation will normally be required to withdraw from the Program, subject to their right of appeal.  

3.2.4 Requirement to Withdraw 
A student who has failed to meet any one or more of the Academic Regulations is normally required to withdraw from the Program, subject to their right of appeal (see section 5).  Further, a student who fails to meet the conditions of their Academic Probation will normally be required to withdraw from the Program.

3.2.5 Effective Date of Sanctions
Sanctions or adverse academic decisions, such as Academic Probation (and its terms and conditions) or a requirement to withdraw, shall take effect as soon as the student accepts the sanction OR exhausts (or allows to lapse) their right to appeal to the next level in accordance with Section 20 of Queen’s University Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights and Discipline:

1. Ordinarily, no sanction, penalty or requirement to withdraw shall be put into effect until the student affected has either exhausted all channels of appeal or has allowed the time for appeal to lapse. For the purpose of this provision, the University will normally consider an adverse academic decision to be a sanction.
2. Notwithstanding subsection (1), where an academic unit determines that the interests of third parties may be prejudiced by the continued enrollment of a student in a course or program, the unit may decide that pending an appeal from an adverse academic decision, the student should not be permitted to continue in the course or program, or may be precluded from progressing to the next academic stage.
3. A student who is subject to suspension from a program under subsection (2) may request that the Chair of the appellate body with jurisdiction over the matter expedite the hearing of the appeal. This request may result in a direction abridging the time for filing of documents, or other interim or preliminary direction made pursuant to Section 36 of Queen’s University Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights and Discipline.

4: ACADEMIC STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS

4.1 Academic Integrity 

Queen’s University is dedicated to creating a scholarly community free to explore a range of ideas, to build and advance knowledge, and to share the ideas and knowledge that emerge from a range of intellectual pursuits.

Queen’s students, faculty, administrators and staff therefore all have responsibilities for supporting and upholding the fundamental values of academic integrity. Academic integrity is constituted by the five core fundamental values of honesty, trust, fairness, respect and responsibility (see https://academicintegrity.org/resources/fundamental-values) and by the quality of courage. These values and qualities are central to the building, nurturing and sustaining of an academic community in which all members of the community will thrive. Adherence to the values expressed through academic integrity forms a foundation for the "freedom of inquiry and exchange of ideas" essential to the intellectual life of the University.

The following statements from “The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity” (2nd edition), developed by the International Center for Academic Integrity (ICAI), contextualize these values and qualities:

1. Honesty: Academic communities of integrity advance the quest for truth and knowledge through intellectual and personal honesty in learning, teaching, research, and service.
2. Trust: Academic communities of integrity both foster and rely upon climates of mutual trust. Climates of trust encourage and support the free exchange of ideas which in turn allows scholarly inquiry to reach its fullest potential.
3. Fairness: Academic communities of integrity establish clear and transparent expectations, standards, and practices to support fairness in the interactions of students, faculty, and administrators.
4. Respect: Academic communities of integrity value the interactive, cooperative, participatory nature of learning. They honor, value, and consider diverse opinions and ideas.
5. Responsibility: Academic communities of integrity rest upon foundations of personal accountability coupled with the willingness of individuals and groups to lead by example, uphold mutually agreed-upon standards, and take action when they encounter wrongdoing.
6. Courage: To develop and sustain communities of integrity, it takes more than simply believing in the fundamental values. Translating the values from talking points into action -- standing up for them in the face of pressure and adversity — requires determination, commitment, and courage.

Students are responsible for familiarizing themselves with and adhering to the regulations concerning academic integrity. General information on academic integrity is available at Academic Integrity @ Queen's University, along with School specific information below.

4.1.1 Departures from Academic Integrity

A departure from academic integrity includes any deliberate attempt to gain unfair advantage academically for oneself or others. All forms of departure from academic integrity are considered serious offences within the University community. The following defines the domain of relevant acts without providing an exhaustive list:

4.1.1.1 Plagiarism 

Allowing it to be thought that another's ideas or phrasings are one's own by failing to provide proper acknowledgement. Some examples are:

• Copying and pasting from the internet
• Copying a printed source or other resource without proper acknowledgement
• Copying from another student in the same or different year of the Program or another Program
• Copying from another’s test paper
• Using direct quotations or large sections of paraphrased material in an assignment without appropriate acknowledgement
• Buying term papers or other assignments and submitting them as one's own
• Submitting the same piece of work in more than one course without the permission of the instructors
• Obtaining a copy of, or information about, a test or exam from an earlier section of the course and writing the test or exam later in the day or subsequent days.

4.1.1.2 Use of Unauthorized Materials

• Possessing or using unauthorized study materials or aids during a test
• Copying from another's test paper
• Using an unauthorized calculator or other aids during a test
• Unauthorized removal of materials from the library, or deliberate concealment of library materials
• Obtaining materials such as answer keys and using them to obtain an unfair advantage.

4.1.1.3 Facilitation

• Enabling another's breach of academic integrity
• Making information available to another student, such as knowingly allowing one's essay or assignment to be copied by someone else, giving a copy of a test or exam to a student writing the same test or exam later in the day or subsequent days
• Selling or distributing term papers or other assignments
• Knowingly assisting another person to conceal their departure from academic integrity.

4.1.1.4 Unauthorized Collaboration

• Working with others, without the specific permission of the instructor, on assignments that will be submitted for a grade
• This applies to in-class or take-home tests, papers, or homework assignments. Students may not collaborate without the instructor’s authorization.

4.1.1.5 Forgery 

• Utilizing counterfeit documents or statements (e.g. creating or altering a transcript, medical note or other official documents).

4.1.1.6 Falsification

• Misrepresentation of one's self, one's work or one's relation to the University
• Altering transcripts or other official documents relating to student records
• Impersonating someone in an examination or test
• Submitting a take-home examination written, in whole or in part, by someone else
• Fabricating or falsifying research data or source material (whether by commission or by omission)
• Allowing someone else to do research work without the knowledge and approval of the instructor
• Failing to appropriately recognize contributions of others
• Attributing authorship of work to persons other than those who have contributed to the work in a meaningful way.

4.1.2 Process for Investigating Suspected Departures from Academic Integrity

The Smith School of Business Policy on Academic Integrity sets out complete procedures and processes for handling suspected departures from academic integrity.  Students are responsible for familiarizing themselves with the policy.  Normally, where a course professor has a concern about a possible departure from academic integrity, the professor will notify the student and investigate in accordance with Smith policy.  The student will have an opportunity to respond and their response will be considered part of the evidence in the case. 

In complex cases the professor may refer the case to the Smith School of Business Academic Integrity Panel for investigation.  In this situation, the Academic Integrity Panel will notify the student of the potential departure and investigate in accordance with Smith policy. 

In cases of a subsequent departure from academic integrity (that is, where there is a previous departure on record for the student), the professor will make a finding but refer the case to the Academic Integrity Panel for the determination of a sanction.     

4.1.3 Sanctions for Departures from Academic Integrity

Following the investigation of the suspected departure from Academic Integrity, the professor/Academic Integrity Panel will either: i) make a finding of a departure from academic integrity and impose a sanction (or refer the matter to the AI Panel for sanction); or ii) determine there was no departure and destroy all evidence of the notice and investigation.

Any student who is found to have committed a violation of academic integrity may face a range of sanctions, including but not limited to: receiving a warning, a grade of zero on the assignment, a failure in the course, a recommendation to Queen's Senate that the student be required to withdraw from the University for a period of time, or that a degree be rescinded. 

Records of findings of departures from AI are kept in the Dean’s Office and in the Program Office.  Students who are found to have subsequent violations of academic integrity will normally face progressively more serious sanctions.

---

4.2 Illness and Extenuating Circumstances Policies

4.2.1 Illness 

A student who claims illness as a reason for missing academic obligations is responsible for informing the professor and the Program Director and may be required to provide evidence of illness.  In keeping with University Policy on Academic Consideration for Students in Extenuating Circumstances, a student suffering from a short-term illness should submit the appropriate form outlining their needs. 

A notification of absence from an examination must be accompanied by documentation as follows:

• in cases of illness when a student is under the care of a physician, the student should provide a note from the physician. Retroactive doctors’ notes (i.e. notes dated from physicians after the illness) are not acceptable.
• If a student is ill, but not under the care of a physician prior to and during an exam, they can provide the appropriate form(s) outlining their situation.

As a matter of academic integrity, a student is responsible for making an honest declaration concerning the nature of their illness and its impact on their academic obligations.  False declarations may be investigated under the Smith Academic Integrity Policy.

4.2.2 Extenuating Circumstances 

The Program adheres to Queen’s Policy on Academic Consideration for Students in Extenuating Circumstances and the principle of a good faith response to requests for consideration.

Extenuating circumstances means a personal circumstance beyond the student’s control that has a direct and substantial impact on the student’s ability to meet essential academic requirements or expectations.  Extenuating circumstances include but are not limited to a sudden or acute physical or mental illness, serious injury to self or significant others, bereavement, a traumatic event, or other serious personal/family crisis.  Extenuating circumstances may also include officially representing the university at a sanctioned event or through an invitation to participate in an event as a distinguished guest (e.g. national tournament, Olympics).

 A student who is unable to satisfy the requirements of a course or the Program due to extenuating circumstances must notify the Program Director in writing as soon as possible.  Students may submit the appropriate form(s).

If the student is requesting a modification of the Program requirements, a formal written request should be submitted to the Program Director.  The request for modification should include an explanation of the connection between the effects of extenuating circumstances on the academic performance, as well as the remedy the student is seeking.

The Program Director will respond to the student’s request for consideration promptly.  The Program is committed to responding to students in a fair and consistent manner, taking into account the specific individual circumstances.  The Program is also committed to upholding academic standards and ensuring that essential academic requirements are met.

4.2.3 Official Documentation 

Official documentation, including notes from health care professionals, need not outline the specific details of the student’s condition, but must clearly indicate ways in which the circumstances directly affect the student’s performance, and verify that these effects were substantial enough to cause the academic disruption.  Information about the start, duration and present state of the condition or circumstances, as well as a clear statement on whether the condition or circumstances have either improved or are being managed so that they will not have a significant detrimental effect on future academic performance, are essential.

Documents submitted may be verified by the Program administration.  False statements or documents may be investigated in accordance with the Smith Policy on Academic Integrity.

4.2.4 Unresolved Circumstances

The appeals process does not compensate for circumstances that the student is unable to resolve, or for which the student is unwilling to actively seek accommodation. In addition, the appeals process does not compensate for circumstances that are actively being accommodated, for example where a student’s permanent disabilities are being accommodated through Queen’s Student Accessibility Services Office.

Multiple appeals citing the same circumstances will be reviewed very closely. This review may include, with the permission of the student, consultation with the appropriate professionals involved to obtain more detailed information. In order for such an appeal to succeed, there must be convincing evidence that the circumstances that affected the student’s academic performance will be resolved within a reasonable timeline, or will be appropriately managed on an ongoing basis.

---

4.3 Language

In accordance with Queen’s University Language Policy, examinations and assignments are to be submitted in English, except where a Faculty Board has approved an alternative practice or where a special agreement has been entered into between the Program and a student.

---

4.4 Acceptable Use of Information Technology Resources Policy 

All members of the Queen’s community are bound by the Queen’s policy on the Acceptable Use of Information Technology (IT) Resources.  The policy states:

The use of Queen's University information technology (IT) resources must be consistent with the academic mission of the University. These IT resources are provided to support the teaching, learning, research and administrative activities of the Queen's community. As a member or guest of the Queen's community, you may have access to valuable internal and external networks and resources, and Sensitive Information, and you are expected to use these resources in a responsible, ethical, and legal manner. Your actions should not adversely affect the ability of others to use these resources, or compromise the security and privacy of sensitive information.

4.4.1 Submission of Electronic Assignments 

Students may be required to submit assignments electronically.  It is the responsibility of the student to ensure that all electronic submissions are corruption-free.

Any assignment that is detected to be carrying a corrupt file will be immediately destroyed, and the student must re-submit the assignment corruption-free. If the assignment is not re-submitted before the assignment deadline it will be marked “late.”

---

4.5 Examinations

4.5.1 Access to Examinations 

The term final examination paper refers to the final examination question paper in a course together with the graded answer paper written by the student. These documents, in accordance with the Senate Policy on Student Access to Final Examination Papers, must be retained by the professor or the School for a period of 12 months.

4.5.1.1 Informal Access 

Professors may informally review the final examination paper with a student who requests it and are encouraged to do so. However, access may not be granted before the final marks are released.

4.5.1.2 Formal Access

A student may obtain access to their final exam as part of an appeal process. This may be supervised access to, or a copy of, the final examination paper.  The student should contact the Program administration to arrange for formal access to their final exam.

4.5.2 Changes to Examination Time

Requests for changes to an individual examination time must be made to the Program Director as soon as the student is aware of a conflict. Normally, such requests will only be granted if extenuating circumstances (beyond the student’s control) will prevent the student from writing the exam at the scheduled time. 

The exam dates for the courses with exams will be posted well in advance of the date of the exam. The policies regarding exam locations and change of dates are set out below.

1. At least one month in advance of the first exam date, students will receive a survey from the Program administration through an online survey setting out the upcoming exam locations. Each student must choose their site preference no later than two weeks in advance of the first scheduled exam date, and this will become the default location for all subsequent exams.
2. Changes to the preferred exam location can be made up to two weeks prior to any subsequent exam by sending a request in writing to both the Program Manager and the Administrative Coordinator, Assignments and Exams at Queen’s. Students should understand that changes requested within two weeks of the exam may not be permitted.
3. All requests for changes to exam dates must meet the following criteria
   1. A written request for the change of date must be received by the Program Manager at Queen’s at least two weeks in advance of the exam; the request must clearly state the reason for the change
   2. All requests must be approved by the Program administration in consultation with the course professor; this process may require supporting documentation
   3. The student requesting the change of exam date must secure their own proctor and secure their own exam location and pay all associated costs. The student will be provided with a list of persons who qualify to be proctors for exams conducted by Queen’s
   4. In extenuating circumstances, changes to exam dates may be considered if the criteria set out in 1 and 2 above are not met.

---

4.6 Queen's University Student Code of Conduct

Queen’s University is dedicated to learning, intellectual inquiry, the dissemination and advancement of knowledge, personal and professional development, and good citizenship.  All students are required to read and adhere to Queen’s University Student Code of Conduct (PDF 1.43 MB).

Students are expected to adhere to and promote the University’s core values of honesty, trust, fairness, respect and personal responsibility in all aspects of University life, academic and non-academic. These core values are intended to inform and guide student conduct as they foster mutual respect for the dignity, property, rights and well-being of others.

As a member of the Queen’s community, every student accepts the University’s policies, rules and procedures and acknowledges the right of the University to set standards of conduct, as well as the right of the University and/or its Authorized Agent(s) to impose sanctions for conduct found to have violated those standards.  

4.6.1 Professionalism and Facilities Etiquette

All study and work spaces provided by Smith School of Business should be treated with respect and care.  All students are expected to properly reserve space, use the facilities for the purposes for which they are intended, and to leave spaces clean, tidy, in the proper furniture configuration and with the room supplies.  

5: ACADEMIC DECISIONS AND APPEALS

Various types of academic decisions may be made by a course professor, Program Director, Academic Progress Committee, Academic Integrity Panel, Academic Appeals Committee and/or the University Student Appeal Board. 

The appeals process at Queen’s University is comprised of several levels of appeal by different appeal bodies.  In accordance with the Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights and Discipline, the decision system is based on the principle that "decisions should generally be made by those who are most familiar with the context”

Appeals of academic decisions fall into four possible categories: appeals of grades (Section 5.1), appeals of other academic decisions (Section 5.2), appeals of academic standing and progression decisions (Section 5.3), and appeals of academic integrity decisions (Section 5.4). 

Note that it is the student’s responsibility to clearly establish that grounds for an appeal exist as the basis for an appeal.  Below the various decision-making bodies and their mandates are explained.

5.1 Appeals of Grades

Grades are determined by course professors.  Appeals of grades in courses (including assignments, examination papers, and final grades) are first handled at the course professor level. 

Examination papers and course marks of students, whose final grade in a course is marginally below a letter grade, and especially below a failing grade, are reviewed with special care by faculty members before such grades are assigned. Therefore, it is unlikely that such a grade is incorrect or unfair to the student.  However, if a student feels that a course grade or a portion of it has been unfairly assessed, they should first make an attempt to resolve the issue informally with the professor.

If the student feels that the issue remains unresolved, they should contact the Program Director who will initiate a formal grade review.  A review of the assignment or examination shall be conducted by two examiners appointed by the Program Director or designate; one examiner shall be the original professor or grader, if available. The review shall involve a re‐reading of the final examination or deliverable(s) in the course and a review of the student’s course record.

Requests for reconsideration of a course grade must be accompanied by payment of a fee of $100. This fee will be refunded to the student if, as a result of the review, a failing grade is raised to a pass or if a pass is raised by as much as five marks or to a higher letter grade.  Note that it is the responsibility of the student to preserve all exercises, papers, reports, and other graded material for the course and to submit a copy of these documents with the request for review. The scanned copy of any graded assignment or material returned to a student shall be deemed to be the original document for the purposes of this section.

The decision of the examiner(s) is final, and there is no further appeal available.

---

5.2 Appeals of Other Academic Decisions 

The Program Director makes some decisions for students facing special circumstances in the Program.  The student should request consideration as appropriate to the Program Director as soon as they are aware of a situation requiring such consideration.  Examples of such decisions could include: changing a course registration from one elective to another, or deferring an exam. 

Appeals of decisions by the Program Director are made to the Academic Progress Committee. 

---

5.3 Appeals of Academic Standing and Progression Decisions 

Students are considered to be in Good Academic Standing unless they have violated one or more of the Academic Regulations of the Program.  As noted, students who violate one or more of the Academic Regulations of the Program are normally required to withdraw from the Program.  In such a case, the Program Director will normally inform the student in writing that, because of their violation of one or more of the Regulations, they are required to withdraw from the Program. 

Appeals of these decisions are made to the Academic Progress Committee.

---

5.4 Appeals of Academic Integrity Decisions 

Course professors will normally investigate and make decisions regarding possible violations of academic integrity in their courses in accordance with the Smith School of Business Academic Integrity Policy and as set out in Section 4.1. 

Appeals of professors’ decisions regarding academic integrity are made to the Academic Integrity Panel. 

In cases where the Academic Integrity Panel is the initial decision maker, appeals are made to the Academic Appeals Committee.

---

5.5 The Academic Appeals Committee

The Smith School of Business Academic Appeals Committee (AAC) has jurisdiction over all matters related to academic appeals involving students registered in the School of Business (with the exception of the PhD and Master of Science programs). The AAC hears appeals of decisions made by Academic Progress Committee and the Academic Integrity Panel.

Normally, the AAC serves as a true appeal board, which is not empowered to substitute its own decision for that of the Academic Progress Committee or the Academic Integrity Panel, but rather reviews the decision of the previous decision-making body based on the same information available to the previous body at the time the decision was made.

The AAC reviews the circumstances of the decision of the previous decision-maker to: ensure that the Academic Progress Committee or the Academic Integrity Panel did not exceed its jurisdiction; ensure that there was procedural fairness; ensure that there was appropriate consideration of extenuating circumstances; uphold the academic policies and principles reflected in the School’s and University’s regulations; and determine if the decision was reasonable.

In rendering a decision, the AAC may uphold the decision of the previous body, grant the student's appeal, or modify the original decision/sanction.  Any decision made by the AAC must be within the scope of the School’s regulations.

Appeals of decisions made by the AAC are made to the University Student Appeal Board.

---

5.6 The University Student Appeals Board

Students wishing to appeal a decision by the Academic Appeals Committee must make their intention known to the University Student Appeal Board (USAB).  The University Student Appeal Board is the final internal appeal body at Queen’s University.  Its mandate is outlined in the Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights and Discipline (SARD).

The decision of the USAB is final, and there is no further level of appeal.

5.6.1 Queen’s University Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights, and Discipline

All students should be familiar with their rights as established in the Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights and Discipline

Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights, and Discipline, Introduction (p. 4).

In situations where new evidence becomes available which may have, or is likely to have, affected the original decision of the previous decision-maker (i.e. the APC or the AIP), the AAC will refer those cases back to the previous decision-maker.

Where the Academic Integrity Panel (AIP) was the initial decision-maker, the AAC will investigate an Academic Integrity case de novo.